Gangster Squad is one of those movies people that profess to love time-period pieces will flock to see. Set in late 1940's Los Angeles , Gangster Squad is the story of a bunch of cops that decide to take on the ruling mob boss in an off-the-books, "fight fire with fire" operation. The participants in this group include but are not limited to a morally unshakable leader with a wife and child on the way, an older contemporary wise in the ways of the world and the gun, a nerdy guy , and token minority cops (hispanic and black oh my!!). If this sounds at all familiar, it's because it really is; Gangster Squad's characters and premise are eerily similar to the those found in the 1987 film The Untouchables starring Kevin Costner and Sean Connery. In fact, there are only a couple main differences between the two films, one being the setting (The Untouchables being set in prohibition era Chicago) and another other being the overall quality.
![]() |
| The Untouchables |
![]() |
| The Gangster Squad |
Ironically, it is through Brolin's performance that the film's faults are really exposed, as his is the only character that is ever really fleshed out in any way, making the rest of the film feel shallow. Now don't misunderstand me, the movie got a lot better, and somewhere between the introduction of a complicated love triangle and a surprising death (similar to one in The Untouchables), the rest of the cast seems to wake up. Ryan Gosling seems to finally start acting after said events, drawing laughs in parts that were probably not even intended to be funny. Even Sean Penn eventually decides he is doing his best impression of an evil Rocky and starts to excel, however the damage is already done and the film never really recovers. Underneath the well choreographed chases, swanky sets, and numerous stars, Gangster Squad manages to feel empty and vapid. The whole thing is meant to be somewhat cheesy for good measure, but the cast never quite commits to the idea, perhaps bridled by the worst dialogue I have seen in a movie since the fifth installment in the Fast and Furious series.
My problems with Gangster Squad aren't stemming from its predictability, as most movies result in fairly predictable outcomes. However, I have a serious problem with movies that can never answer the most simple question in "who cares?". I have searched in vain to answer this question when it comes to this movie for almost two days, with all of its best moments and concepts having come from The Untouchables which is by no means a perfect movie in its own regard. Ryan Gosling sliding across a marble floor in the middle of a chaotic firefight to get ammo, the bad guy and help his partner? Highly reminiscent of The Untouchables' iconic train station scene. There are plenty of fantastic movies that steal concepts, but the difference is ultimately that they do so in new and extraordinary ways. Time and time again, Gangster Squad substitutes originality and substance for style, relying on it's setting so heavily it is hard to find the actual movie.
![]() |
| Hey Girl...you're better than this movie. |
The more I think about the film, the more I would compare it to a rough draft of a high school paper. The work is not without good moments, but a sea of red ink covers it; the poor-word choice and lack of description showing me the creator simply did not edit or review his/her work. It is perhaps that arrogance that is most hurtful about this film to me but will go unnoticed by the majority of people that see it. The parties responsible clearly think we are not worth the effort, and that we are stupid enough to accept an unfinished article that could have been so much more had there been just a little more time put into it. And to add even more fuel to the fire, they used content from a past successful paper not thinking we would notice and it still wasn't great. Honestly people, would you pass such a student?



No comments:
Post a Comment